446 words
survival of the fittestis used to support the superiority of the most popular one in that context. People like to consider themselves 'fit'.
I have always preferred Lego, Scandinavia rules, Sweden in particular. Those who don't assemble furniture full time, go to play guitar. They rock: Mando Diao, The Hives, The (International) Noise Conspiracy, The Teenage Idols. [And I haven't even talked about the elks yet.]
How do people read three digit numbers of subscriptions? I have around 40 and already consider it messy at times.
I read my 132 subscriptions in about an hour and a half a day. Today, that was 10-11 AM and 7:30-8 PM. Seems pretty reasonable to me. I now have my blog-reading computer permanently located at home, where I am not present very often; I find this is a much better use of my time than reading stories 1-2 at a time as they come in, like email.
And yeah, that’s eaten into time I’d otherwise use to post to my blog. My research has been a blast recently, which is good, but rather time-consuming.
Of course bulk reading is more efficient - and it is probably good practice to shut the aggregator (and e-mail) down while working…
I still find that it takes a lot of time and often posts lead to links which lead to other links which’ll make me write a blurb on something myself which’ll cost a lot of time in the end.
The other point I observed in myself is that I tend to skim over things very superficially when there is a large backlog of posts in my aggregator. I am not sure whether this is just good filtering or whether I may not be doing justice to the effort that people may have put into their posts. (Not that I owe them or anything, but where’s the point in reading what people write if you don’t care about it?)